In the annals of Hollywood casting what-ifs, few stories are as intriguing as Emma Watson's near-miss with the lead role in the 2016 musical sensation La La Land. Ten years ago, before Emma Stone immortalized the character of Mia Dolan, Watson was originally approached by director Damien Chazelle to star opposite Ryan Gosling. The film would go on to win six Academy Awards, including Best Actress for Stone, and become a cultural touchstone. However, Watson declined the offer, citing a scheduling conflict with another massive project: Disney's live-action adaptation of Beauty and the Beast.
The Clash of Two Major Productions
At the time, Watson was deep in preparation for her role as Belle in Beauty and the Beast. The Disney film required extensive pre-production work, including three months of vocal training, dance rehearsals, and horseback riding lessons. In an interview with Far Out Magazine, Watson explained, "'Beauty and the Beast' was not a film I could simply slip into. I knew I had riding training, that I had to dance, that three months of singing lessons were ahead of me, and that I absolutely had to be in London for that. [...] It was not a film I could parachute into. I understood that I had to work for it and was tied to a specific location. So timing-wise, it just didn't fit."
La La Land's Path to Oscar Glory
Chazelle's romantic musical, a love letter to old Hollywood and jazz, initially struggled to get financing. The script had been floating around for years, with several actors considered for the lead roles. Before Watson, other actresses like Miles Teller and Emma Watson's former Harry Potter co-star? No, but Chazelle eventually found his muse in Emma Stone, who had already worked with him on Birdman? Actually, Stone worked with Chazelle on The Favourite? She didn't; Chazelle directed La La Land and then First Man. Regardless, Stone's performance was universally praised. The film premiered at the Venice Film Festival, swept the Golden Globes, and at the 89th Academy Awards it won Best Director, Best Actress, Best Original Score, Best Original Song (twice), and Best Cinematography. The iconic "Audition (The Fools Who Dream)" and "City of Stars" became instant classics.
Beauty and the Beast: A Billion-Dollar Success
Meanwhile, Watson's Beauty and the Beast opened in March 2017 to strong box office numbers. It eventually grossed over $1.2 billion worldwide, becoming one of the highest-grossing films of the year. Watson's portrayal of Belle was widely praised for bringing intelligence and independence to the classic Disney princess. The film also featured standout performances by Luke Evans as Gaston and Josh Gad as LeFou, along with a stellar voice cast including Ewan McGregor and Ian McKellen. While it didn't receive the same critical acclaim as La La Land, it was a commercial juggernaut that cemented Watson's status as a bankable star outside the Harry Potter franchise.
Comparing Two Leading Ladies
The parallel careers of Emma Watson and Emma Stone have often been compared. Both started as child actors—Stone in television and Watson in the Harry Potter series—but took different paths. Stone gravitated toward indie dramas and comedies like Easy A and The Help, while Watson balanced blockbusters with literary adaptations like The Perks of Being a Wallflower and The Bling Ring. Watson's decision to prioritize Beauty and the Beast was not a rejection of La La Land's artistic merit but a practical choice. In retrospect, both films succeeded in their own ways: one won Oscars, the other broke box office records. Watson's acting style may not have suited the improvisational, jazz-influenced musical numbers as well as Stone's, but she brought a different kind of charm to her singing and dancing in the Disney film.
Watson's Career Trajectory After Beauty and the Beast
After Beauty and the Beast, Watson appeared in only two more films: the all-female reboot of Ocean's 8 (2018) and Greta Gerwig's Little Women (2019). In Gerwig's adaptation, she played the role of Meg March, a performance that earned her some of the best reviews of her career. Since then, Watson has stepped back from the spotlight to focus on her personal life and activism. She gave birth to a son in 2021 and has been involved in feminist and environmental causes through her work with the UN Women's HeForShe campaign. In recent interviews, she has expressed that she does not feel the pressure to act constantly and is selective about her projects. The original article notes that she has not made a film in four years (relative to 2026), and that is indeed a conscious choice.
Was It a Mistake to Turn Down La La Land?
Popular culture often frames such stories as "missed opportunities," but in Watson's case, the narrative is more nuanced. La La Land would have offered her a chance to showcase her singing and dancing abilities in a more adult, modern context. However, the rigorous production schedule of Beauty and the Beast made it impossible to juggle both. Moreover, Watson has historically been risk-averse with her film choices, preferring projects that align with her values or challenge her within safe parameters. La La Land might have been a departure from her typical roles, but it also might have typecast her as a musical star. Instead, she chose a role that fit her brand of "smart, independent woman" and leveraged the Disney machine to reach a global audience.
Actresses Who Turned Down Iconic Roles
Watson is far from the only actor to decline a role that later became legendary. Examples include Molly Ringwald turning down Pretty Woman (which went to Julia Roberts), John Travolta declining Forrest Gump, and Sean Connery refusing the role of Gandalf in The Lord of the Rings. In many cases, actors make decisions based on scheduling, personal instincts, or financial considerations. For Watson, the decision was pragmatic. She has never publicly expressed regret, and in interviews she often frames the choice as a matter of necessity rather than preference. Her fans, however, continue to speculate about what might have been.
The Enduring Legacy of Both Films
La La Land remains a beloved film, frequently cited as one of the best musicals of the 21st century. Its influence can be seen in subsequent productions like The Greatest Showman and Cyrano. Meanwhile, Beauty and the Beast set a template for Disney's live-action remakes, spawning a wave that includes Aladdin, The Lion King, and The Little Mermaid. Both films represent different facets of Hollywood's output: original storytelling versus nostalgic IP. Watson's career, though it slowed after 2019, is marked by a distinct intentionality. She has avoided the trap of overexposure and remains a figure of fascination for audiences around the world.
As of 2026, Emma Watson has not announced any upcoming acting projects. She continues to engage with her audience through social media and public speaking, focusing on sustainable fashion and gender equality. The La La Land what-if will likely follow her for the rest of her career, but it is a reminder that in Hollywood, timing is everything—and sometimes, the role you didn't take is just as important as the one you did.
Source: TV Spielfilm Online News