Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has become a popular tool not just for diabetics but also for those looking to optimize their health. This article reflects on the author's personal journey with CGMs, showcasing the unexpected psychological effects that come with tracking glucose levels obsessively.
About a year ago, the author decided to experiment with CGMs, intrigued by their rising popularity among wellness influencers and biohackers. The decision stemmed from a desire to understand how glucose monitoring could benefit a non-diabetic individual. With the ability to track real-time glucose levels through devices like the Dexcom Stelo and Abbott Lingo, the author embarked on a journey that would last over a year.
Initially, the experience was relatively pain-free and informative. However, as the months went by, the author found themselves increasingly immersed in the data, consulting with various doctors and reading up on studies to decipher the implications of their glucose readings. Despite being non-diabetic and having normal A1C levels, the author struggled with anxiety triggered by fluctuating glucose readings, particularly elevated morning levels that seemed to indicate a looming health issue.
The journey illuminated the complexities of CGMs. While they provide valuable insights, the author learned that these devices measure interstitial glucose levels, which can often differ from blood glucose levels. This distinction led to confusion and anxiety, especially when experiencing discrepancies between different CGM devices.
The author also noted how the obsession with glucose data began to influence their lifestyle choices. Social events became stressful, with the author avoiding foods deemed risky based on CGM data. This fixation evolved into a problematic relationship with food and exercise, prompting interventions from friends and family concerned about the author's mental health.
The psychological ramifications of using CGMs cannot be understated. The author felt compelled to constantly monitor their readings, leading to heightened anxiety over minor fluctuations. This behavior is not uncommon among those who use wearables for health tracking, as the pressure to interpret data accurately can lead to stress and disordered eating habits.
After a year of testing, the author sought medical advice due to persistently elevated glucose levels and other health concerns. While the CGMs highlighted some underlying issues, the ultimate resolution came through medication and professional guidance rather than the self-optimization journey initially envisioned.
In conclusion, while the benefits of CGMs can be significant for those with diabetes or at risk of metabolic disorders, their use by non-diabetics warrants caution. The technology offers valuable data, but the psychological impact of constant monitoring and the pressure to interpret this data can lead to anxiety and unhealthy behaviors. The author’s experience serves as a reminder of the importance of balance and the need for professional guidance in navigating health technology.
Source: The Verge News